HomeAllAboutServicesProductsContact

About 1 result (0.05 seconds)

Free tool · Corriston Products

Does your page have all four? SEO, GEO, AEO, and AIO — scored in seconds.

The SEO / GEO / AEO / AIO Checker is a free tool that scores any page across all four search pillars — traditional ranking, AI citation, answer extraction, and machine readability.

In 2026, ranking on Google isn’t enough. Your content also has to be worth citing, formatted to answer the question, and technically reachable and readable by AI systems. Four different jobs. This tool scores all four on any public page you paste in.

Updated August 5, 2026.

Loading checker...

Single page check → full-site content map

This checker tells you how one page performs. Content Miner shows what the whole site is hiding.

The SEO / GEO / AEO / AIO Checker is the free first pass: paste one URL and see whether that page is rankable, citation-worthy, answer-ready, and AI-readable. Content Miner takes the same idea site-wide: scan up to 50 public pages, find overlapping content families, surface keyword gaps, score SEO/GEO/AEO/AIO readiness, save scan history, and turn the findings into prompts and content suggestions.

Use the checker when

You need a quick diagnosis on one page before editing a title, schema, answer block, or AI-access signal.

Use Content Miner when

You need to know what to keep, refresh, combine, create, or monitor across the site.

Use paid evidence when

You want Search Console, GA4, keyword gaps, indexation monitoring, and full report history tied to the scan.

See Content Miner →Win 3 free scans →

Read this before you paste Wikipedia

The checker scores how well a page is built to compete for AI citations and answer snippets. It does not score source authority. Wikipedia, .gov, .edu, and major news pages are the sources answer engines already trust — they get cited constantly and will still score low here. If your site is not one of those, this score is what you want to move.

What is SEO in 2026?

SEO is the discipline of getting a page to rank on a traditional search results page, principally Google. The classic on-page signals still matter: title tag inside the 25–60 character range, meta description 70–160 characters, exactly one clean H1, canonical URL, HTTPS, a mobile viewport meta tag, complete share metadata, alt attributes on images, and useful internal links. Off-page, backlinks and brand authority still tilt the ranking, but the ten blue links are no longer the whole search page — AI Overviews, People Also Ask, and featured snippets sit above them. Google’s own SEO Starter Guide is still the canonical reference for the fundamentals.

What is GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)?

GEO is the craft of getting your content cited when large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google Gemini synthesize an answer. LLMs do not simply rank pages — they synthesize answers from sources they judge useful and credible. So the job shifts from “rank on this SERP” to “be one of the sources worth citing when a real buyer asks a real question.” This pillar scores substantive depth, identifiable author evidence, and outbound references to support the claims being made. It is a coarse indicator based on three independently scored signals, so it moves in larger steps than the other pillars. Freshness is shown as context but is not scored, because many strong pages are legitimately evergreen.

What is AEO (Answer Engine Optimization)?

AEO is the craft of winning the boxed answer at the top of a search result, or the equivalent inside an AI response. That includes Google’s featured snippet, AI Overview citations, People Also Ask expansions, and the direct answer inside a ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity response. All of these reward the same page structure: a question in the heading, a direct 40–60 word answer in the first sentence of the paragraph immediately underneath, then supporting detail. The tactical wins are FAQPage schema, HowTo schema for step-based content, question-driven H2s, answer-first paragraphs, and tables for comparisons.

What is AIO (AI Optimization)?

AIO asks whether AI systems can reach, discover, and parse the page at all. It is the technical access layer beneath GEO and AEO: AI crawler rules in robots.txt, machine-readable entity schema, a valid llms.txt, sitemap discovery, and a small presence check for the experimental Open Knowledge Format. AIO is separate from GEO because access is not quality. A page can be perfectly crawlable and still offer nothing worth citing; it can also be excellent source material that a blocked crawler cannot read. When an external AIO check fails, the checker labels it unknown and removes those points from the denominator rather than treating its own fetch failure as the site’s failure.

What does the checker actually look at?

The tool fetches your page server-side and evaluates distinct signals across four independent pillars. Here is the breakdown:

PillarWhat it scoresBiggest single lever
SEOTitle, meta, H1, canonical, HTTPS, viewport, Open Graph, Twitter card, image alt attributes, internal linksTitle tag inside 25–60 chars
GEO (coarse)Content depth, author evidence, outbound citations; freshness is reported as context but not scoredSubstantive content depth
AEOFAQPage, HowTo, and Article schema; question headings; heading structure; answer-first paragraphs; tables and listsFAQPage schema on the page
AIOMachine-readable entity schema, llms.txt, AI crawler access, sitemap discovery, small OKF presence checkAccess for all four AI crawlers

Each scored signal belongs to one pillar only. llms.txt, AI crawler access, sitemap discovery, and machine-readable entity schema now count under AIO. OKF presence is binary and contributes at most 2 of AIO’s 47 raw points. Content freshness remains informational under GEO. If an external AIO fetch fails, that signal is labeled unknown and excluded from the denominator. This scoring model changed when AIO became a fourth pillar, so pages checked under the earlier three-pillar model will score differently now.

How do I read my score?

Each pillar produces a normalized 0–100 score and a letter grade. The overall score is the average of all four pillars. Here is how to interpret what you get back:

  • 90–100 (grade A). Elite. This page is doing the job across all four pillars.
  • 80–89 (grade B). Solid. There are a few specific fixes but no fundamentals are broken.
  • 70–79 (grade C). Real headroom. Usually one or two structural fixes will move it 10+ points.
  • 60–69 (grade D). Weak. Multiple failures compounding. Prioritize schema and question-format headings.
  • Under 60 (grade F). Broken. The page is losing rankings, citations, answer placements, or AI access that it should be winning.

The tool tells you exactly which items passed, which failed, and which are informational notes. Fix the failures top-down — the list is ordered by impact.

Known limitations & false positives
  • Competitiveness is not authority. The checker scores how an answer page is constructed, not how trusted its source already is. Wikipedia, .gov, .edu, and major news sites can score low because they do not need FAQPage schema to earn citations. If your site is not already one of those authorities, these are still useful signals to improve.
  • It is a static-HTML scorer. It fetches server-rendered HTML. Fully client-rendered React or SPA pages can look nearly empty and score badly even when they work for users. Server-rendered and statically generated pages are represented correctly.
  • External AIO checks can be unknown. A timeout, server error, authorization response, or failed request is excluded from the AIO denominator and labeled unknown. A confirmed missing file still scores as absent.
  • OKF is a presence check only. The checker does not validate the bundle’s quality or usefulness, so OKF is capped at 2 raw AIO points.
  • Word-count and citation thresholds are heuristics. A short, excellent page can beat a long one. “Add more words” is a signal, not a mandate.
  • It does not test rendering, Core Web Vitals, backlinks, or whether the content is actually good. Those require browser, authority, and editorial analysis beyond a static HTML check.
  • It reports what it can see in the HTML. It cannot tell you whether a page deserves to rank.

How do the AIO discovery signals work?

AIO combines established access controls with newer discovery formats. The checker reads robots.txt for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, and Google-Extended; checks sitemap discovery; and measures machine-readable entity schema in the page. It also validates llms.txt, a Markdown map at /llms.txt that gives AI systems a curated route to important pages. Open Knowledge Format (OKF) is a Google Cloud v0.1 format for agent-readable knowledge bundles at /okf/. Because this checker detects only whether an OKF path exists, not whether the bundle is valid or useful, it contributes no more than 2 raw AIO points. Read the full llms.txt guide →

Companion reading

Deep dive into what SEO, GEO, and AEO actually mean, plus a checklist for adding all three to a page.

Read: SEO vs GEO vs AEO — the 2026 search trifecta →

Checker FAQs

What's the difference between SEO, GEO, AEO, and AIO?

SEO asks whether a search engine can rank the page. GEO asks whether the content is worth citing. AEO asks whether the page is formatted to win a direct answer. AIO asks whether AI systems can reach, discover, and parse it. The tactics can support one another, but the checker assigns each measured signal to one pillar.

What is AIO and why is it separate from GEO?

AIO (AI Optimization) measures access and machine-readability: AI crawler rules, machine-readable entity schema, llms.txt, sitemap discovery, and a small OKF presence check. GEO measures whether the content itself is worth citing through depth, author evidence, and sourced references. A page can be technically reachable but not worth citing, or excellent but inaccessible, so those need separate scores.

How does the checker work?

You paste a page URL. The tool fetches the page server-side, parses the HTML, and scores four signal families independently: on-page SEO fundamentals, citation-worthiness, answer formatting, and AI access and machine-readability.

Is this a full audit?

No. It's a fast diagnostic on a single page. Content Miner is the next step when you want to scan a full site, compare pages, find keyword gaps, review content suggestions, and keep report history. A manual audit goes even deeper with live AI-citation testing, category query research, and competitor citation share.

Why can't the tool check my page?

The most common reasons: the URL is behind a login, the site blocks non-browser requests, or the page returns JavaScript that only renders in a browser (client-side only). Try the print or AMP version of the page, or send us the URL and we'll run the manual audit.

What score should I aim for?

Anything 90+ is elite. 80-89 is solid. 70-79 has real headroom. Below 70 and you're leaving rankings, citations, answer placements, or AI access on the table — often by a wide margin.

Why does Wikipedia score low on AEO?

This tool scores answer-page competitiveness — how well a page is built to win an AI answer or featured snippet. It doesn't score source authority. Wikipedia is a primary source for the answer engines themselves, so it doesn't need FAQPage or HowTo schema to get cited constantly. If you run a Wikipedia article through the checker, expect a low AEO score and a very different real-world outcome. Same idea for major news sites, .gov pages, and .edu research pages: they're playing a different game.

Who built this checker?

The SEO / GEO / AEO / AIO Checker was built by Gary Corriston, an independent marketing consultant with 20+ years running paid media, SEO, GEO, and marketing operations at private companies and agencies he owned. The scoring rubric comes from real client audits — the same checklist Corriston Consulting runs when engaging on a search-trifecta audit. If you want the full manual audit, including AI-citation testing across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, reach out.

Explore more Corriston tools + products

Back to all products →
Contact →